I say Tunnel Vision, because developers often spend inordinate amounts of time working exclusively in one technology or one programming language (C# for argument’s sake) and forget to touch on some neglected skills like thinking in T-SQL and finding solutions using solely set algebra and set operations.
To give you a concrete example, I present the problem I had (with contrived data for demonstration purposes): given a list of values (say, velocities) with start/end time range for each velocity; in tabular form the input data looks like:
Velocity StartTime EndTime
-------- ------------------- -------------------
40 2009-11-24 05:45:43 2009-11-25 04:23:18
0 2009-11-25 04:23:18 2009-11-26 07:00:00
0 2009-11-26 07:00:00 2009-11-27 06:23:18
40 2009-11-27 06:23:18 2009-11-27 23:57:22
0 2009-11-27 23:57:22 2009-11-28 09:00:00
0 2009-11-28 09:00:00 2009-11-30 01:57:22
0 2009-11-30 01:57:22 2009-11-30 11:00:00
0 2009-11-30 11:00:00 2009-12-02 03:57:22
0 2009-12-02 03:57:22 2009-12-04 05:57:22
40 2009-12-04 05:57:22 2009-12-04 15:45:43
Using only plain set operations in T-SQL, collapse date ranges for matching velocities, to produce the following:
Velocity StartTime EndTime
-------- ------------------- -------------------
40 2009-11-24 05:45:43 2009-11-25 04:23:18
0 2009-11-25 04:23:18 2009-11-27 06:23:18
40 2009-11-27 06:23:18 2009-11-27 23:57:22
0 2009-11-27 23:57:22 2009-12-04 05:57:22
40 2009-12-04 05:57:22 2009-12-04 15:45:43
Simple at the first glance! So I went forward equipped with what I considered a solid knowledge in SQL and set algebra and started working on the solution.
I was amazed at how difficult it was, because I recently had spent the good part of the past year or so thinking exclusively in Object Oriented way and I felt my mind struggled to rid itself of inheritance and polymorphism and to think in joins and unions. I eventually got to the answer, not the most elegant or succinct, but a good answer nonetheless (it is irrelevant to post the solution here).
This morning however, I recanted yesterday’s solution and came up with a 3-line C# LINQ query that produced exactly the desired result.
var collapsedRecords = records
.Aggregate(new List<Record>(), groupingFunctor)
.GroupBy(dco => dco.GroupId, (k, v) => v)
.Select(v => new Record
{
Velocity = v.First().Velocity,
ST = v.Min(_ => _.ST),
ET = v.Max(_ => _.ET)
});
Along with the following simple plumbing:
Func<List<Record>, Record, List<Record>> groupingFunctor =
(list, record) =>
{
record.GroupId = !list.Any() ? 1 :
((list.Last().Velocity == record.Velocity)
? list.Last().GroupId
: list.Last().GroupId + 1);
list.Add(record);
return list;
};
And
//simple model for the records
internal class Record
{
public int Velocity { get; set; }
public int GroupId { get; set; } //helper property
public DateTime ST { get; set; }
public DateTime ET { get; set; }
}
Now we can digress and start raving about the accumulator pattern in the LINQ Aggregate extension method, or we can get to the point of this post:
Most of us juggle more than one language and/or technology. And in order to stay sharp (no pun intended!) we must practice, practice and then practice some more lest time and negligence dulls the edge of our skills.
Finally, I leave you with a bit of Charles Darwin:
"I have steadily endeavored to keep my mind free so as to give up any hypothesis, however much beloved (and I cannot resist forming one on every subject), as soon as the facts are shown to be opposed to it."